Writing Satire in a World That’s Already Absurd
It is a terrible time to be a satirist. It is also,
paradoxically, the only time worth being one.
For centuries, the job description of the satirist was
relatively straightforward: look at the world, identify the hypocrisy, crank it
up to eleven, and point and laugh until the establishment felt slightly
uncomfortable. Jonathan Swift suggested eating poor Irish children to highlight
British economic oppression (A Modest Proposal). Mark Twain skewered the
romanticized nonsense of antebellum America through the unvarnished lens of a
runaway boy and an escaped slave.
They thought they were pushing the envelope. They thought
they were testing the boundaries of absurdity.
Had Jonathan Swift lived to see the year 2024, he wouldn’t
have written an essay about stewing babies; he would have simply opened a
Twitter feed, screenshotted three random posts about cryptocurrency, and called
it a day. Why invent a preposterous scenario when reality is currently
out-performing the most deranged fever dreams of a room full of comedy writers
hopped up on espresso?
If you try to write satire today, you quickly run into a
brick wall known colloquially as Reality. You invent a headline about a
billionaire launching himself into the thermosphere in a phallic rocket while
his warehouse employees wear adult diapers, and three weeks later, it actually
happens. You write a joke about a politician doing something so profoundly
moronic that it defies the laws of physics, only to wake up the next morning
and find out they’ve been re-elected by a landslide.
Satire is dying, they say. How can you parody a parody of a
parody? How do you exaggerate a culture that treats its own collapse like an
interactive live-stream event?
Let’s dive into the glorious, agonizing craft of writing
satire in an age where the world has collectively decided to jump the shark and
keep swimming.
The Death of the Onion and the Birth of the News Cycle
To understand the modern crisis of satire, you have to look
at its primary executioner: the 24-hour news cycle, powered by social media
algorithms designed by algorithms that were likely coded by sociopaths.
For a long time, The Onion was the gold
standard of satirical news. They wrote headlines like, "Area Man
Passionate Defender of What He Imagined Constitution to Be." It was funny
because it was a recognizable, slightly heightened version of your annoying
uncle at Thanksgiving.
Today, your uncle doesn't just misunderstand the
Constitution; he believes it was secretly drafted by extraterrestrial lizards
in 1842 to protect his right to post blurry photos of horse dewormer on
Facebook.
When reality becomes indistinguishable from a post-ironic
shitpost, the traditional tools of the satirist start to rust. Irony is dead,
buried, and dancing on its own grave. Sarcasm doesn't sting anymore; it just
gets retweeted by the subject of the sarcasm, who uses it to fundraise an extra
two million dollars by sundown.
You write a satirical piece about a tech CEO trying to
replace human hearts with subscription-based biometric microchips, and half
your readers think it’s a LinkedIn thought-leadership article. They aren't
laughing. They're asking for the pre-order link.
This leaves the modern satirist in a state of perpetual
exhaustion. You aren't just competing with other writers; you’re competing with
a geopolitical landscape that looks like a drunken game of Civilization
VI played by a toddler.
The Purgatory of Poe’s Law
You cannot talk about writing satire in the 21st century
without bowing down in sheer terror before Poe’s Law.
For the uninitiated, Poe’s Law is an internet adage which
states that, without a clear indicator of the author's intent, it is utterly
impossible to create a parody of extreme views that someone somewhere won't
mistake for the genuine article.
In the old days, you could drop a winking phrase, italicize
a punchline, or end your piece with a broad, theatrical nudge. Today? Forget
about it. You can write an article titled, "Local Man Argues That
Drinking Industrial Bleach Will Give Him the Abs of a Spartan," and
within ten minutes, you will get an email from a guy named Chad in Idaho
demanding to know the exact brand of bleach and whether it’s keto-friendly.
This creates a terrifying design constraint for the
satirist. If you make your satire too subtle, people believe it and incorporate
it into their daily worldview. If you make it too obvious, it stops being
satire and just becomes a lecture.
Walking this tightrope requires a delicate touch. You have
to create a funhouse mirror that distorts the world just enough to reveal its
inherent ugliness, but not so much that the reader looks at it and
thinks, “Ah, yes, just another normal Tuesday.”
Why We Do It Anyway (The Coping Mechanism)
If the world is already absurd, why bother writing satire at
all? Why not just sit on the floor of a dark room, wrap yourself in tin foil,
and wait for the robot overlords to finish us off?
Because satire isn't just a literary genre; it’s an immune
response.
When things get terrifying—when institutions crumble, when
language loses its meaning, when powerful people do impossibly stupid things
with terrifying consequences—laughter is the only weapon the rest of us have
left. It is the rhetorical equivalent of the kid in the horror movie who points
at the monster and laughs. It doesn't kill the monster, but it takes away its
power. It strips the pompous of their pomp and the powerful of their armor.
Satire reminds us that we are not crazy.
When you spend all week reading about economic collapse,
political theater, and influencers shilling dehydrated water, you start to feel
like you're losing your mind. You start to wonder if you’re the
one who doesn't understand how the world works.
Then a good satirist comes along and writes a piece that
neatly dissects the madness, holds it up to the light, and says, "No,
you aren't crazy. This is, in fact, completely insane."
That moment of shared recognition—that collective, knowing
exhale—is worth every bit of the struggle.
The Rules of Engagement for the Post-Satire Era
So, how do you write satire when the world has stolen all
your best material? How do you punch up when everyone is already in a state of
free-fall?
If you want to survive and thrive as a satirist today, you
have to throw out the old playbooks and adapt to the chaos. Here is your
survival guide.
1. Stop Trying to Out-Crazy Reality
The biggest mistake amateur satirists make is trying to
invent a scenario more wild than the morning headlines. If you try to write a
story about a politician accidentally starting a nuclear war because they were
trying to change their TikTok profile picture, you’re going to lose, because
that probably happened on Tuesday.
Instead of going wider, go deeper. Don't focus on the what;
focus on the why. Real life is full of insane events, but it’s
remarkably thin on self-awareness. Lean into the rationalizations. Explore the
corporate press releases issued after a global disaster. Write about the
internal Slack channels of the people steering the Titanic into the iceberg
while arguing about font sizes.
Reality gives you the plot. You provide the psychology.
2. Aim for the Mechanics, Not the Clowns
It’s easy to write satire about the people at the very
top—the cartoonish villains, the blundering figureheads, the easy targets. But
in a modern bureaucratic society, the real absurdity doesn't live in the
individuals; it lives in the systems.
Target the language. Target the euphemisms. Target the way
modern institutions talk about catastrophe with the breezy enthusiasm of a
wellness coach.
When a company lays off ten thousand people and calls it
"optimizing our human capital synergy matrix," that is pre-packaged
satire. You don't even have to change the words; you just have to repeat them
with a slightly deadpan expression until the audience hears how sickeningly
hollow they are.
3. Embrace the Specificity of Human Despair
Broad satire—making fun of "politicians" or
"millennials" or "tech bros"—is lazy and, frankly, boring.
It’s been done to death.
The best satire lives in the hyper-specific. It’s about the
guy who spends $4,000 on an artisanal, hand-forged charcoal grill to cook hot
dogs that taste like soot because he's trying to reconnect with his primal
masculinity after a stern email from his HR department.
When you drill down into the micro-absurdities of daily
life, you bypass the exhausting noise of the 24-hour news cycle and tap into
something universal. People might disagree on politics, but everyone knows what
it’s like to pretend to care about a Zoom meeting that could have been an
email.
4. Let the Reader Do Some Heavy Lifting
In the golden age of internet hot-takes, every piece of
writing came with a neon sign flashing: THIS IS A JOKE, PLEASE LAUGH.
Stop doing that.
Let people walk into the trap. If a few gullible readers
miss the point and get mad in your comments section, consider it a badge of
honor. The fear of being misunderstood is the death of good comedy. If you
soften your edges to make sure absolutely everyone knows you're kidding, you
end up with watered-down, toothless comedy that offends no one and enlightens
less.
Write with absolute, unyielding conviction. Play it
straight. Deliver the most deranged premise with the solemn dignity of a BBC
news anchor reporting on the harvest. Let the audience figure out where the
floor drops out.
The Satirist’s Burden
At the end of the day, writing satire in an absurd world is
a fool’s errand. It’s like trying to paint a mustache on the Mona Lisa while
the Louvre is actively on fire.
And yet, we do it.
We do it because humor is the great antidote to despair. We
do it because when the world becomes a circus, the only sane response is to
grab a pair of oversized shoes and step into the ring.
So keep writing. Keep pointing out the naked emperors, the
algorithmic feedback loops, the corporate doublespeak, and the sheer,
unadulterated nonsense of being alive right now. The world might not get any
better, and your jokes might occasionally get mistaken for real news by your
local hardware store clerk, but at least you’ll go down laughing.
And honestly? In a world this absurd, that’s the best
victory we’re going to get.
Comments
Post a Comment